> Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ; > Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 08:42:12 -0700 (PDT) > From: Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mailed-from: GNU Emacs (19.34.1), of course > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/492 > X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Precedence: list > Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict > > problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9. > > > > I've had this problem on both Linux machines I can experiment on: > > > > > > 0. with ld.so-1.9.8 installed: > > > > 1. Installed jdk1.1.6v1-test.tar.gz exactly as it appears on blackdown. >> Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ; > Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 08:42:12 -0700 (PDT) > From: Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mailed-from: GNU Emacs (19.34.1), of course > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/492 > X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Precedence: list > Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict > > problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9. > > > > I've had this problem on both Linux machines I can experiment on: > > > > > > 0. with ld.so-1.9.8 installed: > > > > 1. Installed jdk1.1.6v1-test.tar.gz exactly as it appears on blackdown. > > >> Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ; > Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 08:42:12 -0700 (PDT) > From: Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mailed-from: GNU Emacs (19.34.1), of course > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/492 > X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Precedence: list > Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict > > problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9. > > > > I've had this problem on both Linux machines I can experiment on: > > > > > > 0. with ld.so-1.9.8 installed: > > > > 1. Installed jdk1.1.6v1-test.tar.gz exactly as it appears on blackdown. > > >> Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ; > Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 08:42:12 -0700 (PDT) > From: Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mailed-from: GNU Emacs (19.34.1), of course > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/492 > X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Precedence: list > Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict > > problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9. > > > > I've had this problem on both Linux machines I can experiment on: > > > > > > 0. with ld.so-1.9.8 installed: > > > > 1. Installed jdk1.1.6v1-test.tar.gz exactly as it appears on blackdown. > > > > 2. Applet ran fine. (Except for the frame being "off the screen" to > > the upper left). > > > > 3. Installed ld.so-1.9.9 > > > > 4. Got a Thread Alarm!!! > > Rats! I hate when incompatibilities are introduced in the dynamic linkers. > Can you try copying the libdl that I presume came with ld.so into the > lib/green_threads directory (replacing the libdl that's there) and run your > test again? > Works fine, but I expect that would be the same thing as would happen if I just let /lib/libdl.so.1 work normally. > > > > 5. Removing .../green_threads/libdl.so.1 (? this is from memory), > > and ../green_threads/libc.so.5 and rerunning ldconfig cleared > > up the problem. > > Are you on a pure libc system or do you have glibc installed? I have glibc available as a test library but libc.5 is still my primary baby. > > Steve > > > > > 2. Applet ran fine. (Except for the frame being "off the screen" to > > the upper left). > > > > 3. Installed ld.so-1.9.9 > > > > 4. Got a Thread Alarm!!! > > Rats! I hate when incompatibilities are introduced in the dynamic linkers. > Can you try copying the libdl that I presume came with ld.so into the > lib/green_threads directory (replacing the libdl that's there) and run your > test again? > Works fine, but I expect that would be the same thing as would happen if I just let /lib/libdl.so.1 work normally. > > > > 5. Removing .../green_threads/libdl.so.1 (? this is from memory), > > and ../green_threads/libc.so.5 and rerunning ldconfig cleared > > up the problem. > > Are you on a pure libc system or do you have glibc installed? I have glibc available as a test library but libc.5 is still my primary baby. > > Steve > > > > > 2. Applet ran fine. (Except for the frame being "off the screen" to > > the upper left). > > > > 3. Installed ld.so-1.9.9 > > > > 4. Got a Thread Alarm!!! > > Rats! I hate when incompatibilities are introduced in the dynamic linkers. > Can you try copying the libdl that I presume came with ld.so into the > lib/green_threads directory (replacing the libdl that's there) and run your > test again? > Works fine, but I expect that would be the same thing as would happen if I just let /lib/libdl.so.1 work normally. > > > > 5. Removing .../green_threads/libdl.so.1 (? this is from memory), > > and ../green_threads/libc.so.5 and rerunning ldconfig cleared > > up the problem. > > Are you on a pure libc system or do you have glibc installed? I have glibc-2.0.7pre3 available as a test library but libc.5 is still my primary /lib/libc. > > Steve > > > -- todd --
