Nelson Minar wrote:
> >However, most of your proposed solutions fall wide of the mark.
>
> Gee, so sorry. Again, there's no fundamental problem with Linux Java,
> the problem is something in your own environment.
I'm sure you're right. I was just trying to figure out what that was.
> >Now here is a detail that may be more relevant: There are 19 .java
> >files in the package. The compilation under linux is making them into
> >19 class files. When compiling under Win95, 27 class files are
> >created. Two of these are for non-public classes defined in other
> >java files. The other six files have names like xxxxx$1.class where
> >xxxxx.java is one of my project files (xxxxx.class is also created by
> >the compilation).
>
> The $1 files (and $2, etc) are anonymous classes. If javac on Linux
> isn't producing them, something is very strange about your setup.
> Maybe they're being placed elsewhere?
Hmm. No, they're being produced, all right. And they are in the jar
file. I just checked. I wonder why I don't find them on the other end
when I unjar everything.
