>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Kranz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Kontorotsui wrote:
>>> Probably because RMI is implemented in Java 1.2. I am waiting for RMI
> too,
>>> right now I'm forced to work on a Solaris workstation...at least it's not
>>> windows :)
> Right, I also was told to wait for 1.2.
>> 
>> Eh? RMI is in the linux JDK already. And it works.
>> "rmiregistry" I think is the command u want...
>> I've had linux Java talking to solaris Java via RMI.
> Ok. But I was really looking for the rmi object activation process on the
> server "rmid". So what you did "to solaris" I want to do "to linux".
Do you mean "rmic"?  The stub and skeleton compiler?

The linux and Solaris versions are effectively identical - certainly
in regards to RMI.  We've been using RMI (client, server and
compile-time) on all of {windoze,linux,solaris,macos} since the beta
days of 1.1 - I'm not sure what you could be looking for that isn't
there. 

cheers,
        -mik

-- 
Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to