At 10:21 AM 12/7/98 -0800, David Wall wrote: >>What is the idea of Java? Portable code. > >If that's all they claim, they will lose, since portable code has existed >long before their patent. Now, portable code inside web browser may be >different, though some might argue that HTML itself is code that executes >inside a browser, so again, such patents may be VERY hard to enforce. > >David Its more like they patented the browser plug-in concept with distributed capability(?) Java can run outside the browser. If the patent is applicable to Java it should only pertain to the Java plug-in and in-browser execution. Patents may be found at http://www.uspto.gov/ Douglas Toltzman (who will now stop sending all this noise)
- Re: [FYI] Java violates US patent? Anthony Rossini
- Re: [FYI] Java violates US patent? Java News Collector
- Re: [FYI] Java violates US patent? Alex Pozgaj
- Re: [FYI] Java violates US paten... John Summerfield
- Re: [FYI] Java violates US p... Nelson Minar
- Re: [FYI] Java violates US p... Dimitris Vyzovitis
- Re: [FYI] Java violates US paten... Robert McConnell
- Re: [FYI] Java violates US patent? Robert McConnell
- Re: [FYI] Java violates US patent? Ernst de Haan
- Re: [FYI] Java violates US patent? David Wall
- Re: [FYI] Java violates US patent? Java News Collector
- Re: [FYI] Java violates US patent? Darryl Luff
- Re: [FYI] Java violates US patent? Christopher Hinds
- Re: [FYI] Java violates US patent? Java News Collector
- Re: [FYI] Java violates US patent? Stefaan A Eeckels