> In practice, Java threads are woefully underspecified, and so it's > nearly impossible to write correct multithreaded Java. This is the > most serious deficiency in Java. I agree, kernel threads (with > preemption and real priority scheduling) is the right way to go, and > I'm glad to see that Linux now supports them. What, specifically, do you see as the problems? Where are there places that the specification should be tightened up? M.
- Java performance Marvin McNett II (GTA)
- Re: Java performance Mario Camou
- Re: Java performance Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Java performance Ryan Sutter
- Re: Java performance Paul Houle
- Java threading Anonymous
- Re: Java threading mlorton
- Re: Java threading Michael Thome
- Re: Java threading Anonymous
- Re: Java threading Anonymous
- Java Performance Narendra Sankar
- Re: Java Performance Matt Avery