Michael Doherty wrote: > > Works great! Thanks Rich. I'm frankly kinda amazed. Jikes seems about > an order of magnitude faster than the jdk117_v1a compiler. Not sure how > that's possible but goota hand it to the guy(s) at IBM who wrote it. Native code (Jikes) vs Java (Sun compiler) implementation. Plus some built-in Jikes cleverness to check dependencies and avoid unneeded compiles. Java still has a ways to go in delivering the promised native-like performance... and not just on Linux. Nathan Meyers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs xemacs) Michael Doherty
- Re: Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs xemacs) Richard Jones
- Re: Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs xema... Michael Doherty
- Re: Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs xema... Michael Doherty
- Re: Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs ... Nathan Meyers
- Re: Some initial impressions (was: emacs... Michael Thome
- Re: Some initial impressions (was: ... Richard Jones
- Re: Some initial impressions (w... John Summerfield
- Re: Some initial impression... Richard Jones
- Re: Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs xemacs) Chris Kakris