Tony Pujals wrote:

> Ouch!  ;-)
> 
> (But I'd still like to know what happened to the web site information?)
> 
> Tony

Fair enough desire. Those of us who've been on the list awhile have endured
frequent storms of "where is JDK1.2?" activity, and perhaps our fuses have
become a little short. We're all anxious for the bits; a perusal of the archives
will turn up those discussions and even some progress reports -- hence my
impatience with someone who admitted not doing the homework. Granted, it would
be nice to keep the site a bit more up-to-date -- that's also been discussed --
but that's not getting top priority at the moment.

Nathan


> At 10:14 AM 2/16/99 +0000, you wrote:
> >Tony Pujals wrote:
> >
> >> Not long ago (not much more than a week ago), the web site had some
> >> information about the 1.2 port. Where did it go?...
> >> 
> >> (If this issue has already been discussed, then I apologize in advance for
> >> not researching the archives.)
> >
> >The issue has been discussed extensively... see the archives. Cardinal rule
#1
> >of laziness: if you're going to be lazy, it's wiser to pretend ignorance 
> >than to
> >advertise it :-).
> >
> >Nathan
> >
> >---------------------------------------------
> >This message was sent using Endymion MailMan.
> >http://www.endymion.com/products/mailman/
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>       Tony Pujals
>       ObjectMedia, Inc.
> 
> Tel:  (408) 255-2700x101
> Fax:  (408) 255-5553
> Email:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Web:  http://www.objectmedia.com
> 
> Unite for Java - Join the Java Lobby Now!
> http://www.javalobby.org
> 
> "It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that that Swing"
> 
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------
This message was sent using Endymion MailMan.
http://www.endymion.com/products/mailman/

Reply via email to