John Summerfield wrote:
> Why glibc 2.1? Linux libc6 C Library 2.0.7pre6 is all that's required for
> kernel 2.2.2 (which I'm running). I have glibc-2.0.7-29 and java's fine
> here.
Well, I don't know if it was wholly rational or not, but I'd broken
something in my shared libs and needed to reinstall anyway, so . . .
Really, this is the only app that seems broken so far. I did recompile
a few other things just to be safe. At any rate, the "why" is pretty
academic now!
Perhaps the maintainers could compile a version linked against glibc
2.1?
Geoff
--
Geoffrey T. Cheshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
