On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Robb Shecter wrote: > Is it me, or did the original question get kind of lost here. :) The original question was originally answered at the beginning of this thread. > So the question is whether some runtime-license-free library could be used > instead. Is this possible? Yes. I'm working on an implementation using GTK+. Nigel Gamble [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mountain View, CA, USA. http://www.nrg.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Jeff Galyan
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Ulli Kortenkamp
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Michael Emmel
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Jeff Galyan
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Michael Emmel
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Nigel Gamble
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Michael Emmel
- Re: Non mofit AWT. peter . pilgrim
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Michael Emmel
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Robb Shecter
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Nigel Gamble
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Jonathan Mark Brooks
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Nathan Meyers
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Maksim Lin
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Nigel Gamble
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Jeff Galyan
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Michael K Vance
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Jonathan Mark Brooks
- Re: Non mofit AWT. peter . pilgrim
- Re: Non mofit AWT. Peter Dunkley