At 05:20 PM -0700 04/26/99, Pete Wyckoff wrote: >For 1.1 you may want to back up to 116v5, or you can try 1.2pre-v1, >but I've personally had no success with 1.1.7 and glibc2.1 either. There is a solution for jdk117 on glibc 2.0 and 2.1 Read JitterBug for detail. It's more that a month old already, it seem nobody read JitterBug. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- glibc 2.1 binary fertig
- Re: glibc 2.1 binary Tom McMichael
- Re: glibc 2.1 binary Uncle George
- Re: glibc 2.1 binary Tom McMichael
- Re: glibc 2.1 binary Tom McMichael
- Re: glibc 2.1 binary Pete Wyckoff
- Re: glibc 2.1 binary Tom McMichael
- Re: glibc 2.1 binary Pete Wyckoff
- Re: glibc 2.1 binary Tom McMichael
- Re: glibc 2.1 binary Paul Ho
- Re: glibc 2.1 binary Tom McMichael
- Re: glibc 2.1 binary Scott Murray
- Re: glibc 2.1 binary Juergen Kreileder
- Re: glibc 2.1 binary Steve Byrne
- Re: glibc 2.1 binary Scott Murray
- Re: glibc 2.1 binary Paul Ho