ARGH! <cue thumping of Chris' head on keyboard> I guess that's what I get for
living in the world of "stable-stable-stable" instead of playing around with
new whiz-bang features... one of these days I really ought to download 1.2 and
take a good close look at it to see what else changed. In the mean time maybe
I should just preface everything I say with "for jdk1.1.x yada yada yada..."
Thanks for the info Nathan. -=Chris
At 10:02 PM 5/17/99 -0700, Nathan Meyers wrote:
>You might want to rethink this advice. "jre" goes away in 1.2; "java" is the
>correct invocation... it even accepts the -cp option in 1.2.
>
>Nathan
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Chris Abbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, May 17, 1999 9:36 PM
>Subject: Re: Delivering Java Apps
>
>
>> Which brings up another point, unless your application is targeted
>> to your fellow developers, use jre over java... not only are
>> you gaurenteed that if they have even a minimal runtime it'll work,
>> but (and someone please back me up or shut me up on this) I think
>> there is less overhead on the JRE runner than on the JAVA runner....
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
!NEW!-=> <*> cabbey at home dot net http://members.home.net/cabbey/ <*>
"What can Microsoft do? They certainly can't program around us." - Linus
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version:3.12 http://www.geekcode.com
GCS$/IT/PA$ d(-) s++:+ a-- C+++$ UL++++ UA++$ P++ L++ E- W++ N+ o? K? !P
w---(+)$ O- M-- V-- Y+ PGP+ t--- 5++ X+ R tv b+ DI+++ D G e++ h(+) r@ y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
