Alexander V. Konstantinou writes:
> If you read the JVM threading specification, it explicitely states that
> threads of the same priority are *NOT* guaranteed to be time-sliced.
> This is the most common cause of incompatibilities, as software that
> works on MS WinNT (has time-slicing), breaks on other operating systems
> without time-slicing. The solution is to have the busy thread execute
> with a lower priority.
... which breaks on platforms where there is only one
priority to have, nes pas? Or do the specs guarantee
you at least two priority levels nowadays?
b.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
