Rachel Greenham wrote:
>
> > This is not absolutely true.
> > There are case where your dynamic content includes generated/altered
> > images.
> > You need X for awt/java2D to work.
>
> Yes, this is true. Luckily I haven't needed this once. We tried to write
> software to manipulate images without a window on the screen. Basically
> impossible. :-(
Yes, it is really ugly ;-}
Although you will have to do it anyway for processing ( awt/java2D don't
provide any extraordinary kind of functionality for image processing ),
developing the codecs from scratch is a real burden.
Nathan's suggestion about Xvfb is really appealing in this case!
-- dimitris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
