Did you specify the right classname (with and without package) in the
two javah invocations? Did you notice that the two javah invocations
produced .h files with different names?
Nathan
JB wrote:
>
> Nathan Meyers wrote:
> >
> > JB wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all. I have created and successfully run a JNI *.so on RH6 but for
> > > one thing.
> > > When I package the java src that contains the native methods, I get an
> > > UnsatifiedLinkerError for the method call. When I try to package it, it
> > > seems to load properly but dies when I call any native methods. The
> > > package name is fine. I thought it may be a namespace issue. Any
> > > pointers would help.
> >
> > The name of the native entry point is derived from the full
> > package+class+method name. If you rerun javah on your classfile, you'll
> > see it's now expecting a different name for the native function.
>
> I tried that and ran a diff against the *.h's with and without the
> package declaration and they come out on my machine exactly the same.
> Can I assume then that this is not normal?
>
> "java -version" reports:
> java version "1.2"
> Classic VM (build Linux_JDK_1.2_pre-release-v2, native threads, sunwjit)
>
> cheers
> jb
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
