Does "had good luck" mean without having to modify LD_LIBRARY_PATH? Or
/etc/ld.so.conf?
Ted Neward
Patterns/C++/Java/CORBA/EJB/COM-DCOM spoken here
http://www.javageeks.com/~tneward
"I don't even speak for myself; my wife won't let me." --Me
-----Original Message-----
From: dave madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, September 30, 1999 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: "proper" place for the .so native libraries
> =>From: Brett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> =>...
> =>Where is the "proper" location for the *.so native library files?
>
>I've had good luck putting them under:
>
> .../jdk-1.2/jre/lib/i386/
> ^^^^ appropriate platform here!
>
> =>One JNI tutorial said the following:
> =>LD_LIBRARY_PATH='pwd'
> =>export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
>The first problem is that you've used forward-tics instead of
>back-tics. You should have said:
>
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
>This has a better chance of working, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is
>notoriously cranky. It's best if you can set things up so you don't
>need it.
>
> =>Also, does the blackdown install set a LD_LIBRARY_PATH? or need one?
if
> =>so, where is it located?
>
>The "java" shell script sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH appropriately when you
>run it; if you had a LD_LIBRARY_PATH set previously, then it
>{pre?app?}pends the directories it needs. (Same with CLASSPATH, I
>think.) I've had trouble with both, and now try my damndest to avoid
>having to set both.
>
>d.
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
