Hi,
Does anybody know comparable benchmarks for Java, C and C++ tasks?
I am interested in comparative speed of the languages - any platform
is good. So far I heard only about two years old Java/C++ comparison
on NT, which stated similarity in speed under some conditions.
Thanks,
Jacob Nikom
Raja Vallee-Rai wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We have formally evaluated the different virtual machines available for
> Linux
> and thought it would be worthwhile to share the results with the Linux
> community.
>
> The following tests were conducted on an unloaded dual processor Pentium
> II/400mhz running Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.2.8). Each benchmark
> execution was
> repeated ten times. We discarded the maximum and minimum results, and
> averaged
> the remaining 8 execution times.
>
> The first 9 benchmarks come from the specJVM98 benchmark suite
> (http://www.spec.org), and the last two benchmarks come from our own
> private
> collection.
>
> base(s): time in seconds to run under blackdown jdk 1.2, pre-release 2,
> with jit.
>
> sunint: speedup (base time/this time) of the blackdown jdk1.2,
> pre-release 2,
> with no jit.
>
> borjit: speedup of blackdown jdk1.2, pre-release 2, with the Borland jit
> installed (http://www.borland.com)
>
> ibmjit: speedup of the AlphaWorks IBM 1.1.8 JIT
> (http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com)
>
> A # indicates that the run failed validity checks.
>
> base(s) sunint borjit ibmjit
> check .84 - 1.33 - 1.25 # 1.75 -
> compress 65.61 - .15 - 1.07 - 2.42 -
> db 148.43 - .57 - .98 - 2.98 -
> jack 64.50 - .43 - 1.35 - 3.65 -
> javac 75.67 - .54 - 1.21 - 2.51 -
> jess 50.86 - .47 - 1.44 - 2.67 -
> mpegaudio 54.61 - .15 - 1.19 # 2.32 -
> mtrt 40.32 - .41 - 1.78 - 2.79 -
> raytrace 55.56 - .45 - 1.92 - 3.04 -
> sablecc-w 42.57 - .58 - 1.06 - 2.32 -
> soot-j 132.93 - .69 - 1.25 - 2.26 -
>
> The conclusions are fairly obvious. Now, if only IBM had a jit for
> 1.2... We
> also evaluated shujit and tyajit, but they were unable to run most of
> the
> benchmarks correctly. Stay tuned for a comparison of NT Java Virtual
> Machines in
> the near future, on the same hardware.
>
> Permission is granted to re-distribute this e-mail in any medium as long
> as it
> remains unchanged. All trademarks belong to their respective owners.
>
> To everyone working on Java for Linux: keep up the great work! :)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Raja Vallee-Rai ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Sable Research Group
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
