Well, I kinda gathered from your previously emails that we were kinda
getting out of your area of expertise, but you've still been quite
helpful. As I have searched throughout the jdbc drivers (they are not in a
jar), and they don't seem to have any libraries with them, I'll assume
they don't.  I'll look into getting the newer version of the JDBC drivers,
which I want anyway, and see if that doesn't help.

Thanx for your help.

On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Chris Abbey wrote:

> my understanding of the Sybase JDBC drivers is that they, like Oracle,
> include native code. Thus somewhere out there on your dasd around about
> the same place the jdbc drivers are (probably in a jar) there should be
> a lib?????.so. You may only be using classes, but they could have native
> methods in them - in fact they probably do. This is where someone from
> the Sybase user community (or better yet, their support department) would
> be very handy to have in on the discusion - they may very well say that
> they don't have any, and that all IPC is handled by tcp sockets and high
> level protocols... in which case the question to them is "then why does
> getConnection() fail under only java_g??" (I'm assuming it works under
> normal java) Note that when I started trying to help I understood the
> problem to be with in RMI when trying to use Runtime.trace*() . . . my
> code does that all the time, thus I was sure I could help you; now that
> it's looking like Sybase I'm getting farther and farther out of my watter,
> aside from basic JNI issues. -=Chris
> 
> At 14:57 10/18/99 -0600, Brandon Anderson wrote:
> >I'm sorry, but I'm obviously missing something.  What *.so and *_g.so.  As
> >far as I know the only libraries that I'm using are the ones included
> >with the JDK and Debug JDK Versions.  I'm using class files for the Sybase
> >stuff.  And my java files are not being compiled into a library.  Maybe
> >I'm missing your point, but please enlighten me.
> 
> 
>   cabbey at home dot net <*> http://members.home.net/cabbey
>            I want a binary interface to the brain!
> Today's opto-mechanical digital interfaces are just too slow!
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to