Vincent Risi wrote:
> Andreas Rueckert wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Thu, 18 Nov 1999 Paul Mclachlan wrote:
> >
> > The next problem occured when I wanted 2 parsers to use the same base classes
> > for the AST. Never managed to do that, and I couldn't patch JavaCC, since there
> > were no sources available.
>
> TLA's are fine if you know what they stand for, what is AST?
Abstract Syntax Tree : )
Whats a TLA ?
Umm yes I was looking at antltr it allows sub classing.
It looks like I like the power of antlr and the syntax of Javacc : )
It should not be too hard to write a Javacc--> antlr preprocessor.
Then antlr can accept Javacc grammers ...
Anyone intrested ????
What would be really nice god forbid is if there was some sort of standard syntax
for
java parser and lexer generators. Life would be cool if you could publish a
"standard" grammer.
Mike
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
