[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nelson Minar) writes: > > However, I disagree that native threads are required for serious > applications. Green threads work surprisingly well for many > applications. In some, they work better. I recently wrote a spider > program that was invoking another program in a subprocess and blocking > on IO to it. When I had 20 threads (and 20 subprocesses) the green > threads did much better than native threads. That's not entirely > surprising, either. This is all fine and good until you need to exploit an SMP system! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Sun and Inprise Java 2 announcement Paolo Ciccone
- Re: Sun and Inprise Java 2 announcement Nathan Meyers
- Re: Sun and Inprise Java 2 announcement (... Jørgen H. Seland
- Re: Sun and Inprise Java 2 announcement John Neffenger
- Re: Sun and Inprise Java 2 announcement Peter Schuller
- Re: Sun and Inprise Java 2 announcement Paolo Ciccone
- Re: Sun and Inprise Java 2 announcement Nelson Minar
- Re: Sun and Inprise Java 2 announcement Paul Michael Reilly
- Re: Sun and Inprise Java 2 announcement Nicholas Wright
- Re: Sun and Inprise Java 2 announcement Nelson Minar
- Re: Native vs. green threads Matt Welsh
- Re: Native vs. green threads Scott Murray
- Re: Native vs. green threads Weiqi Gao
- Re: Native vs. green threads Scott Murray
- Re: Native vs. green threads Steve Nguyen
- Re: Native vs. green threads John Neffenger
- Re: Sun and Inprise Java 2 announcement Doug Robinson