I was actually trying to make a reference to the fact that I have not
yet seen a mention of Red Hat in our discussions of who should be
driving Java on Linux. Why is that?
Jim
Tony Dean wrote:
>
> Jim,
>
> There is such an organization. Its called the Opensource movement. You
> only
> have to look as far as Linux to see the potential. Linux is more
> stable and generally
> performs better than Win NT and there is plenty of resources behind
> NT. look at Perl and
> gcc/g++ to see what can happen. The Opensource movement has more
> resources behind
> it than even the giants like IBM and AT&T.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > ...
> > > But there's an awful lot of evidence that
> > > mounting a serious Java environment effort is not really possible
> > > without the financial resources to feed and clothe a small army of
> >
> > > full-time developers.
> > >
> > > Nathan
> >
> > If only there were a Linux organization/corporation with those kind
> > of
> > financial resources...
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > --
> > ==
> > ==================================================================
> > Jim Kimball
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ----------------
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> Tony Dean
> Linux: The choice of a GNU Generation!
>
>
--
=====================================================================
Jim Kimball
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
