OK that was with the inprise jdk.  I had to switch back to blackdown because the
Inprise jdk was core dumping on me.  Now I'm getting the same 'invalid message
hash' ServerException with Blackdown and I can't fix it no matter what I do with
my policy file.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> They were in sync.  I discovered I got the same message after I killed the
> server!  I had been playing with my policy file before, and I had removed
> the allpermission that had been granted to jdkhome/lib/ext.  When I put
> that back all my problems went away.  The permission thing seems real
> screwy to me.
>
> On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Chris Abbey wrote:
>
> > it means the method you were calling has somehow changed since the
> > server's _Skel class was compiled. I know you said they're in sink,
> > but verify that the client and server both have the same version of
> > the interface, the impl, the _Stub and the _Skel classes... also
> > verify that the _Stub and _Skel match the interface and that the
> > impl matches the interface. Greping the outputs of -verbose for the
> > class is the quickest way to check the first one, the second will
> > take some code review. -=Chris
> >
> > At 19:27 12/16/99 -0500, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> > >What does this exception thrown by my rmi client mean?  The client
> > >compiles with the latest version of the server.
> > >
> > >java.rmi.ServerException: RemoteException occurred in server thread;
> > >nested exception is:
> > >        java.rmi.UnmarshalException: invalid method hash
> > >java.rmi.UnmarshalException: invalid method hash
> > >        at
> > >sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.exceptionReceivedFromServer(StreamRemote
> > Call.java,
> > >Compiled Code)
> > >        at
> > >sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.executeCall(StreamRemoteCall.java,
> > >Compiled Code)
> > >        at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java, Compiled
> > >Code)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >   cabbey at home dot net <*> http://members.home.net/cabbey
> >            I want a binary interface to the brain!
> > Today's opto-mechanical digital interfaces are just too slow!
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to