I'm running RedHat Linux 6.0, but with an upgraded kernel (2.2.14) 
and a new glibc (2.1.3), which is what comes with RedHat 6.2.  In 
case it matters, I've also tried the glibc that comes with RedHat 6.1.
I'm running JDK 1.2.2 RC4, the latest version available.
Running with green threads and no JIT seems to work alright, though I 
haven't tested it thoroughly.
Running with native threads (and no JIT) results in the following:
$ java -native -version
SIGSEGV   11*  segmentation violation
     si_signo [0]: no signal
     si_errno [0]: Success
     si_code [0]: SI_USER [pid: 0, uid: 0]

The process runs out of control.  The process list involving java 
looks like this:

30034 pts/6    S      0:00 
/usr/local/jdk1.2.2/bin/sparc/native_threads/java -version
30072 pts/6    R      0:49 
/usr/local/jdk1.2.2/bin/sparc/native_threads/java -version
30073 pts/6    S      0:00 
/usr/local/jdk1.2.2/bin/sparc/native_threads/java -version

I've managed to install the hotspot JIT (it took some effort, since 
it tries to run the JDK with the -native flag during installation), 
but when I run Java with the JIT on, I get the following error:
$ java -green -version
HotSpot VM warning: Cannot recognize SPARC version (0x5). Default to V9
#
# HotSpot Virtual Machine Error, Unexpected Signal 4
#
# Error ID: 4F533F4C494E55580E4350500CC0 FF
#

I'm not running on a V9 (which is an UltraSparc chip, no?) I'm 
running on a SparcStation 10, with whatever CPU is in there.  Is it 
safe to assume that hotspot simply does not support the CPU in my 
machine?

I'm running on a Sparcstation 10.  Does anyone run a machine with a 
similar configuration?  If anyone does, and nobody knows a solution 
to this problem, could you send me a note and we could compare 
configurations, and see what might possibly be different about them 
that could be causing this?

Thanks,
Avi Cherry


----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to