At 19:04 7/17/00 -0700, Nathan Meyers wrote:
>But you're *not* running javac with no arguments. No arguments suggests
>you don't know the command and want some help - specifying an argument
>like "@empty" suggests something very different. BTW, IBM's JDK1.3
>compiler behaves the same way.
as will most/all other 1.3 based javac's... due to the common code
base and all.
and yes Mo, I purposely refrained from answering, :) I'm too close to
the heart of the question, and responses like Nathan's are what I've
been waiting for... disinterested objective observers. :) Thanks Nathan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
