David Brownell wrote: > Heh ... the real fun begins when the last name-mangling issues get > resolved, and folk start using DDD with GCJ compiled code! :) > I don't know if it'll work with interpreted code though. Yeah, there isn't really a solution for debugging interpreted code w/ GCJ (our interpreter doesn't even support stack traces, yet). Ideally, we'd implement the JVMDI in libgcj and allow seamless stepping between compiled and interpretted/JITted classes, but to do that we'd really need to use BFD, and there are some licensing issues there that would need to be worked through (or around). regards [ bryce ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
