On Tue, 29 May 2001, Christopher Smith wrote:
>
> Can anyone explain to me why having the file in the path set in ld.so.conf
> shouldn't be enough?
Heh. Try getting the security nazis to agree to THAT for a user application.
I'm not sure, but I don't think the JVM uses ld to load its stuff. Otherwise
why would it keel over when the shared library still has unresolved references?
--
Joi Ellis Software Engineer
Aravox Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No matter what we think of Linux versus FreeBSD, etc., the one thing I
really like about Linux is that it has Microsoft worried. Anything
that kicks a monopoly in the pants has got to be good for something.
- Chris Johnson
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
