2014/1/21 21:04 -0800, Andrew Haley <[email protected]>: > There are some JCK failures in the draft RI. > > compiler tests: all ok > devtools tests: all ok > runtime tests: 68928 passed, 68 failures, 0 errors > > Failures: > api/org_ietf/jgss/GSSContext/* (14 total): > all caused by missing support for AES256, so I'd say it's expected
Hrm, maybe you expect them but they're not known failures. Could you please send me (privately) the relevant .jtr file and also a description of the system on which you're running the JCK (OS, kernel version, hardware, etc.)? I'll forward that information on to the JCK team for analysis. > api/java_util/Base64/Decoder/* (20 total): > caused by missing methods in the package java.util.base64 > > api/signaturetest/sigtest.basic.html#basic[java] (1 total): > dtto caused by missing methods in the package java.util.base64 > > many (almost all) other failures: > +-infinity returned instead of NaN in Double/double computations We think these are known failures, but again if you could send along the relevant .jtr files then we can make sure. Thanks, - Mark
