Hello!

I have been waiting for code-first approach to handle custom exceptions for 
about three years now...

So I always have to use contract-first approach to get it to work.
Its really time consuming but not much to do.

Regards
Pär Malmqvist


Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:15:03 -0500
Subject: Re: Axis2-1.5.1 and user exceptions
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

I have been puzzled by this issue for long time. Seams like at this point, 
using contract-first approach is the only solution for now.
But it will still be very very helpful if something can be done so code-first 
approach can work too. Axis1 definitely worked. I can imagine lots of people 
are using code-first approach because of its simplicity.

Thanks!
Li

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Mauro Molinari <[email protected]> 
wrote:

Il 17/02/2010 3.53, glopezm ha scritto:


Any thoughts/experiences with a similar issues with axis2?




I use contract-first approach. My user exceptions extend Exception and have a 
field called faultMessage with getter getFaultMessage and setter 
setFaultMessage. The constructor prepares the faultMessage and sets it via 
setFaultMessage. The faultMessage is an object of a class generated by 
WSDL2Code from an XMLSchema type that describes my fault message, so that it 
implements ADBBean.




In this way, when my code raises my user defined exception, Axis2 recognizes 
the existence of the fault message and attaches it correctly to the fault 
returned to the client code.



This is the result of my trial-and-errors researches of some years ago with 
Axis2 1.3 and it is working with Axis2 1.5 too. I think that you may find 
something else in this mailing list archive by me on this subject.




-- 

Mauro Molinari

Software Designer & Developer

E-mail: [email protected]



-- 
Li Ma
[email protected]


                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969

Reply via email to