Deepal,  Thanks for the feedback.  I have my sleep set to 30000 (should be 
enough) and have blocked it in Eclipse too.  Have also tried sendRobust().  Any 
other ideas? 

William


-----Original Message-----
From: Deepal jayasinghe [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 6:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: InOnly client code?

Hi William,

When you invoke the service using fireAndForget you need to put put a
sleep statement after invocation, if you do not do that the main thread
terminate before sending  the message.
> Has anyone had success writing an In-Only client that they'd be willing to 
> share?  I've deployed a simple In-Only service on WebSphere that works fine 
> via soapui, but when I try to invoke it via a Java client it doesn't run, 
> completely.  That is, I can see the log4j trace with additional activity 
> after the usual ending "Exiting deleteAttachments()" entry. I know it doesn't 
> completely run (which I know sounds strange) because I have another service 
> for interrogating the static variable it initializes.   Using tcpmon I'm not 
> seeing any significant difference in the SOAP messages, which I've 
> constructed "manually" or via Axiom APIs based on what I see soapui sending.  
> I've tried using fireAndForget and robustSend along with stub invocation 
> (equivalent of the Axis2 generated test case), the latter fails with 
> AxisFault: The input stream for an incoming message is null.
>
> Thanks,
> William
>
>
>
>
> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
> is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
> on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
> addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>   


-- 
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would 
it?" - Albert Einstein


http://blogs.deepal.org
http://deepal.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to