Hi;

Metro can also work with .NET clients. I had no hands on experience with
Metro but my firends are using it with .NET clients.

I had .NET clients and my services were handled by Axis2. There was no
problem also. Axis2 was doing well.

So reading the system requirements can also be a point for a desicion. Metro
need jdk 1.5 or higher .



--
İbrahim DEMİR
twt: @ibrahimdemir
ff:    @ibrahimdemir
http://www.ibrahimdemir.org


On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 19:03, Srinivasa K <kusampudi.a...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Dennis,
>
> Thank you very much for the details that you provided. When we reviewed
> your article, it seems Metro is good in performance point of view - compare
> to CXF and Axis2. Do you suggest to go with Metro? At this point of time we
> are looking for the best one in overall performance and implementation.
>
> We have web services clients with different platform, like Java, C# and
> Natural(SotwareAG). We also have to consider the best interoperability with
> this platforms. We tested with Axis2 on C# client and we solved array issues
> that we had with Axis1.
> We appreciate your suggestion on this.
>
> Thanks,
> Srini
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Dennis Sosnoski <d...@sosnoski.com>wrote:
>
>> Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>> My IBM developerWorks series on Java Web Services (
>>> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/views/java/libraryview.jsp?search_by=java+web+services:)
>>> has details on the configuration issues and performance (though the main
>>> performance article on CXF seems to be missing in the search results right
>>> now - I'll post a direct link to that when I can track it down).
>>>
>>
>> I saw that Ibrahim had this "missing link" in his email response (thanks,
>> Ibrahim!):
>> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jws14/index.html
>>
>>  - Dennis
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@axis.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@axis.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to