On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Deepal jayasinghe <deep...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Deepal Jayasinghe <deep...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> >>
>> >> I looked and the code segment you mentioned, but that is to process
>> long
>> >> running services. We had somewhat similar code to process request comes
>> with
>> >> replyTo header. If no one has removed then, we can fix the issue in
>> AMR.
>> >
>> > This is for processing addressing headers with replyTo header.
>>  I agree, but that is inside isAsync, so we need to have the parameter
>> to come to this logic.
>>
>
> yes you need to add this parameter DO_ASYNC = "messageReceiver.
> invokeOnSeparateThread"  to services.xml.
>
> Do you want to make this by default. Then what about the backward
> compatibility :)
>
>   Long running services and two transports non-blocking invocations are
> two different things. So, we do not need to make DO_ASYN the default.
> However, I am talking about the removal of an existing functionalities, so
> backward compatibility is already broken.
>

I am not sure about the functionality you talk about. Is it possible you to
find the commit which has removed that functionality you talk about?

thanks,
Amila.


>
>
> Thanks.,
> Deepal
>



-- 
Amila Suriarachchi
WSO2 Inc.
blog: http://amilachinthaka.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to