hi... i m also working on same topic to call web service dynamically but not able to achieve it so far...
could u plz help me how u have performed dynamic invocation of web service... the complete scenario and its entire development.... On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Sardar Hussain < salarzi_...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a strange issue with performance evaluation using Axis2 middleware. > I have two scenarios of calling web services through a client. One in > centralised fashion and the other in decentralised fashion. Centralised > scenario 1 goes like this: > I have a client that dynamically invokes 5 different services in a > workflow fashion. I have engaged a custom module as inflow handler to the 5 > different services. I calculate the performance evaluation of calling these > 5 services with the engagement of my module as well as without engaging the > module. > When I call these services through the same client as a workflow, without > my custom module then it takes 1912 milli seconds. However, when I engage > my custom module to the services it takes 2070- milli seconds. This shows > the performance overhead of my custom module equivalent to 160 milli > seconds. > > The second secnario 2 of decentralised invocation of the same services > goes like this: > A client invokes the first service of the 5 different services. Then the > first service invokes the second service and similarly the sequence goes to > the invocation of service 5 through the service 4. These services are > invoked asynchronously (withoutout blocking) as a workflow. These services > perform their own functionalities like in the earlier scenario, however, > they are playing the role of a client for the invocation of the next > service. > Now the performance I get with the engagement and without engagement of my > custom module goes like this: > Without engageing the module it takes ~ 1450 milli second, which is less > than 1850 as was the case in scenario 1, because they are invoked in > decentralised fashion and hence no centralised bottleneck. > But when I invoke this decentralised invocation with the engagement of the > same module, it takes more than 2094 milli second. which shows that the > module I have engaged is taking more than 600 milli second. I am wondering > this module is the same as was engaged in scenario 1 and it took 160 milli > second. However, here it takes much more (~ 600 milli second) compared to > the centralised one. Can one kindly guide me through where and what the > reason might be? > > regards, > > Sardar Hussain > > -- With thanks and regards Navinderjit Kaur
