Epoch is in seconds... I am also forced to used a date filter on most of
searches... how bad is the performance hit of that. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 9:54 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: search performace

Is epoch a Date?  or a String?  If a String, what format is it?

Sorting by a Date keyword field will be sorting as a String value, 
which is a fair bit more resource intensive than if it was numeric.

Try using a purely numeric field (though as a String) that can be 
represented as an int be sure to specify the sort type as an int and 
see if that improves performance.  I'm pretty certain you'd still get 
better performance by using a boost than a sort though.

        Erik

On Mar 17, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Michael Celona wrote:

> I am sorting against an epoch time stored in my index. By using:
>
> contactDocument.add( Field.Keyword( "epoch_time", epoch );
>
> Then I sort by this field.  My search time is in the order of 3sec on 
> an
> index of about 6G using simple searches against a text field.  By using
> boosts I was hoping to increase performance.  Do you think this will 
> make a
> big difference?
>
>       Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:43 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: search performace
>
> I've been effectively off-line for a few days, so I'm not sure if
> anyone has replied on this thread yet.
>
> Using boosts will definitely use less resources than sorting.  If you
> do use sorting for dates, be sure you're doing it numerically rather
> than lexicographically.
>
>       Erik
>
> On Mar 10, 2005, at 8:45 AM, Michael Celona wrote:
>
>> I have a large index that needs to yield very fast query times.  I am
>> sorting by date as default since I am interested in the most recent
>> documents.  I was wondering if I boosted the score of my documents in
>> proportion to the date and not sorting would this increase search
>> performance. Thoughts?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Michael
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to