> +entity:product +(name:"audio cable"^2.0 content:"audio cable")
Looks good to me. This query would only return products where either name or content matches "audio cable" (or both), and name matches get a higher score. > Also I saw that > my OR gets represented as a blank in the query. Is that fine? Yes. Actually each BooleanClause can have a required (+) or prohibited (-) mode. That's why the following expansions take place: - x AND y -> +x +y - x OR y -> x y - x AND NOT y -> +x -y (off the top of my head) I for one prefer to use +/- syntax instead of AND/OR because those I find misleading. > The results from executing this query seem alright, but is this a good > way of achieving the results I was trying to achieve? (NOTE: My original > post explains what I am trying to do). I have tried to explain your query with my own words. See for yourself if they match :) Aside from all that, did you really want to query for the _phrase_ "audio cable"? Perhaps you wanted the words "audio" and "cable" to appear anywhere in the fields, but not necessarily as a phrase. -- Maik Schreiber * http://www.blizzy.de GPG public key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1F11D713 Key fingerprint: CF19 AFCE 6E3D 5443 9599 18B5 5640 1F11 D713 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
