Hi, > If you store only IDs in Lucene, you won't be able to search using > > keywords (text). > > > Let me explain better. Suppose I have an index field called > categories which > contains a list of ids for each post. For example - 1 2 45 198. Now I > can > search on the contents field but restricted to all posts under a > particular > category by using - > > "content:java and category:45 or 198". > > Note - Not exact syntax but I hope you get the picture. Anything > wrong with this approach?
Nothing wrong with this approach. You'll likely want/need to write your own Analyzer to make sure your numeric IDs are not discarded (some Analyzers discard them). Perhaps you'll want to use PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper. > That way you get PG+Lucene in a single package. > > > > That would be a killer combo. > > But what I would like to know is if anybody on this list has used > tsearch2 > but later moved on to lucene because of reasons of speed, search > flexibility, etc. Lots of people did that for reasons of speed, flexibility, as well as disk usage. If your application is a small one, you may be able to stick with just PG. Otis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ -- Find it. Tag it. Share it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
