thanks for the response. I understand that using Filters can do the trick, but there are other issues invloved. Suppose I cluster the results only on the 1st field i.e. I do not show the constituent clusters. Even in this case, i'll require around 900 Filters[i have 900 unique terms] in memory and will have to run the same query 900 times, 1 on each Filter. I am sitting at a situation where I get around 15 queries/sec on an average. Even if I spare another machine to return me the clustering results, I'll be firing 15*90 = 1350 queries/sec.
1. Am I thinking in the right direction? 2. If yes, then what else can be a more feasible solution? Thanks in anticipation, kapilChhabra -- Sent from the Lucene - Java Users forum at Nabble.com: http://www.nabble.com/Search-Results-Clustering-t249355.html#a731549
