You mentioned that "it will scale well in the future". Does this imply that it doesn't scale well now? What are the current limitations of the Lucene Highlighter? Does does it perform under high query load?
This is just a curiousity of mine, but nutch has a separate Summarizer: net.nutch.search.summarizer. The Nutch summarizer looks much more efficient ( aka more simplistic) and therefore probably more scalable? This is probably a question for the Nutch user list, but why doesn't Nutch use the Lucene Summarizer? Thoughts, comments? - Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Dan Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 8:28 AM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Displaying search context What you are doing is a good, scalable practice. You need to store those email messages somewhere outside of Lucene, and use a unique id to correlate the two. When you want to display relevant text for a search result, find the file on disk, and pass it through the Lucene Highlighter (see the Lucene sandbox). This will give you what you are looking for, and it will scale well in the future. Anand Kishore wrote: >Hi, > >I am indexing emails through Lucene. The body of the mails is stored in >an ''Unstored" field. I also have a search interface setup which >returns me all Documents matching my query. What i need is to display a >few lines from the body of the mails where the queryTerm was found. How >can this be achieved as the body is just indexed but not stored. > >Thanx > >- Andy >http://da-tek-ee.blogspot.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
