It's XML like this. It has 120-ish volumes with references to 12,107 articles
which are like this below:
<article>
<fno>A1003</fno>
<doi>10.1041/A1003s-1995</doi>
<fm><hdr><hdr1><ti>IEEE Annals of the History of Computing</ti>
<crt><issn>1058-6180</issn>/95/$4.00 <cci><onm>© 1995
IEEE</onm></cci></crt></hdr1>
<hdr2><obi><volno>Vol. 17</volno>, <issno>No. 1</issno></obi>
<pdt><mo>Spring</mo><yr>1995</yr></pdt>
<pp>pp. 3-3</pp></hdr2></hdr>
<tig>
<atl>About this Issue</atl><pn>pp. 3-3</pn></tig>
<au
sequence="first"><fnm>J.A.N.</fnm><snm>Lee</snm><role>Editor‐in‐Chief</role></au>
</fm>
<bdy>
<p>The first issue of our 17th volume is as diverse in topics as any nontheme
issue that we have tried to present over the past many years. However, it still
represents the work of the English‐speaking world of the North Atlantic
rather than a broader picture of computing in the whole world. The Editorial
Board and the article editors of the <it>Annals</it>
are doing their best to bring the history of the whole world of computing to
our readers, but it does require authors in other countries to offer their
manuscripts for our consideration. Please take this as an open invitation to
authors in other parts of the world to submit papers to the <it>Annals</it>
for review and help us to follow the lead of our parent organization in being
the “The World’s Computer Society.”</p>
<p>The five major articles in this issue represent several manuscripts that
have been in our files for some time, and we are grateful to the authors for
having “stuck with us” while we reviewed, re‐reviewed, and
reworked their papers. Articles in the field of history do not always present
the work of the authors themselves (though we welcome pioneers to give us their
own stories, as in the case of the 1935 article by John McPherson in this
issue); thus, answering the question “is it accurate?” is not
always easy. In fact, we ask our referees to answer the following questions
about each manuscript, and their responses determine whether we accept the
manuscript “as is” or whether we ask the author(s) to revise the
material:</p>
<l2>
<li>
<p>Are the issues addressed in the paper stated clearly enough?</p></li>
<li>
</bdy></article>
