On 11/21/05, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Modifying Analyzer as you have suggested would
> require DocumentWriter additionally keep track of the field names
> and note when one is used again.
For position increments, it doesn't have to be tracked. The patch to
DocumentWriter could also be:
int position = fieldPositions[fieldNumber];
+ if (position>0) position+=analyzer.getPositionIncrementGap(fieldName)
Talk of position increments feels like it belongs more in Analyzer.
Do you actually need to control that per field instance (rather than
per field name/type?)
I think your patch straight-forward and probably the simplest for the
user, and the most flexible (if it's needed to that degree). I just
don't know if anyone has objections to expanding the Field class even
more (and with analysis stuff), so I'm throwing out possible
alternatives.
-Yonik
Now hiring -- http://forms.cnet.com/slink?231706
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
