>The feature vector may be bigger than the object-predicate pairs. In my >application, each document may be annotated with several concepts to say >this document contains an instance of a class. How do you do that? I have to reengineer the ontology in my application, but I'm not sure how to express that a document belongs to one or more concepts. Would you mind sending my your ontology?
>I am very interesting at your approach. You can see the page rank like >method used in the SWOOGLE. But the relations they used only some simple >relations, Such as "import" (used in OWL files"). IF we can use the >Semantic level relations, It's should be better. But I am not sure it can >succeed, as it requires how to weight the relations. Yes. I will have to provide some meta information about the ontology. You can store this information as an Owl annotation, or in an extra file. I will start to implement this during the weekend. I think it will be hard to find the right weights for the predicates, I will keep you informed. Cheers, Klaus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
