Eh,

I did some some tests after I sent the email to see if I was doing it right and they confirmed your results. The scores were higher for boosted content.

Thanks for the reply

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure this is a bug or incompatibility with Luke - I'm using
boosted documents, and I seem to remember that Luke reported everything
as 1.0, even though my test applications showed things correctly.
The boost in the final app is working fine, so the functionality of
Lucene appears to be correct.
Cheers,

Tim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Don Vaillancourt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 January 2006 17:48
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Boost value and LUKE


Hello All,

I am testing the boost value within the latest version of Lucene and I'm

inspecting the results through Luke.

For each FIELD that I want to boost I use the setBoost method. And everything looks good. But Luke is refusing to exposure the boost value

and keeps returning 1.0 for the specified columns (well actually all columns) when I have set one column to 0.5 and the other to 0.75.

1. Is there something I am doing wrong?
2. Is there a bug in Lucene?
3. is there a bug in Luke?

Anyone have any hints.

Thank You



--
Don Vaillancourt
Director of Software Development
WEB IMPACT INC.
phone:   416-815-2000 ext. 245
fax:     416-815-2001
toll free:       866-319-1573 ext. 245
email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
blackberry: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
web:     http://www.web-impact.com
address: http://www.mapquest.ca <http://www.mapquest.com/maps/map.adp?country=CA&addtohistory=&formtype=address&searchtype=address&cat=&address=99%20Atlantic%20Ave&city=Toronto&state=ON&zipcode=M6K%203J8>

This email message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information that may be confidential and/or copyright.

If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender by reply email and immediately delete this email.

Use, disclosure or reproduction of this email by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. No representation is made that this email or any attachments are free of viruses. Virus scanning is recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient.

Reply via email to