Thanks Chris for making it clear, I had read the comment but I had not
understood that it implied incompatibility. But will the code be preserved
in Lucene 2.0, in light of the comment contained in the Lucene 1.9.1
announcement ?
QUOTE
Applications must compile against 1.9 without deprecation warnings
before they are compatible with 2.0.
UNQUOTE
Victor
From: Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene 1.9.1 and timeToString() apparent incompatibility with
1.4.3
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:54:27 -0800 (PST)
: timeToString() and stringToTime() classes are used. Using an index
created
: with 1.4.3 and searched with 1.9.1 I now receive the following errors:
As the deprecation comment in DateField says...
If you build a new index, use DateTools instead. For existing indices
you
can continue using this class, as it will not be removed in the near
future despite being deprecated.
...DateTools is not backwards with DateField, which is why that comment
tries to make it clear that you shouldn't use DateField for new indexes,
but you can continue using it for old ones without fear.
: I assume there is a better way to do this than the above as this
: incompatibility is not documented.
: I know I can always revert to the old code in order to avoid re-creating
the
: index, but I would prefer to find a solution that uses the latest classes
: AND avoids re-creating the index, if possible.
: thanks for any help,
if you don't wnat to rebuild your index, then just keep using the
DateField class and everything will be fine.
-Hoss
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
mycareer.com.au: http://www.mycareer.com.au/?s_cid=213596 Land the Job
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
