Forget.... ;-) I use 32-bit platform (Fedora Core release 3), 1 GB RAM, Celeron 2.40GHz.
-----Original Message----- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 4:33 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: speed Importance: High I'm curious, how many documents in your index and what kind of queries are you issuing? Even 1.6 seconds is a LONG time for a search in most Lucene indexes. Erik On Mar 10, 2006, at 5:38 AM, Anton Potehin wrote: > I try 2 way for get count results: > > 1) > Query q = .... > IndexSearcher is = .... > int count = Is.search(q).length(); > > 2) > Query q = .... > IndexSearcher is = .... > CountCollector collector = new CountCollector(); > Is.search(q, collector); > Int count = collector.getCount(); > > First way return results for 1.644 sec. > Second way return results fot 3.088 sec. > Why first way faster then second? > Can I accelerate it? And how? Can you offer any ways for get number of > results? > > > ----------------------CountCollector > import org.apache.lucene.search.HitCollector; > > /** > * @author Anton Potekhin > * @date: 03.03.2006 17:28:03 > */ > public class CountCollector extends HitCollector { > > private int numberRusults = 0; > public int getCount() { > return numberRusults; > } > > public CountCollector() { > > } > > public void collect(int doc, float score) { > if (score > 0.0f) { > numberRusults++; > } > } > } > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
