Doug Cutting wrote:
I assume that your merge factor when calling addIndexes() is less than
90. If it's 90, then what you're doing is the same as Lucene would
automatically do. I think you could save yourself a lot of trouble if
you simply lowered your merge factor substantially and then indexed
everything in one pass. To make things go faster, set
maxBufferedDocs=100 or larger. This should be as fast as what you're
doing now and a lot simpler.
Or is that the part where I was supposed to "bear with" you?
Doug
Yep. This code was written when I had to index tons of stuff on linux,
and was constantly running into file handle issues (even with low merge
factors). I ended up writing a wrapper for lucene that handled it all
for me, and I've just been reusing it. Then today, I ran into this
issue. It may be time to rework some of the wrapper to take advantage
of the lucene updates :)
Dan
--
****************************
Daniel Armbrust
Biomedical Informatics
Mayo Clinic Rochester
daniel.armbrust(at)mayo.edu
http://informatics.mayo.edu/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
