I don't know if terracotta is the right solution for you or not but...
--> Their examples talk of a 4 node cluster. This is way too small for my needs. No 4 node limit. It was just a sample probably. Cheers, Steve -----Original Message----- From: Biggy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 7:57 AM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Clustering Lucene with 40 Servers I'm currently investigating the best ways of clustering Lucene. I've heard of both Solr, Terracotta but do not know how well they scale. Their examples talk of a 4 node cluster. This is way too small for my needs. I have 30x JVMs each handling 3 requests/sec and each having their own Lucene index. The index changes are propagated to the cluster members using JGroups messages. This solution has more than reached its limit as JGroups has become unstable and a source of many JVMs crashes. Based on current traffic trends I anticipate needing to upgrade to 40x + JVMS very soon. Can anybody suggest a way to effectivily cluster / replicate document changes ? P.S.: JMS is not a possible solution as this was the prior JGroups solution. We had too many memory problems/queue full etc crashing the servers thereafter. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Clustering-Lucene-with-40-Servers-tf2886546.html#a8064135 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
