Hi Erik, Would that slow performance a bit? For example, say I receive 50,000 hits from a search. From your explanation, I have to retrieve the DB id from each hit, perform a query to the DB using the id to retrieve the full contents for each hit, run highlighter on each content, and then return? Although I'll give this a shot, it will seem to slow performance on the searching side of things, wouldn't it? Thanks for the reply.
-los Erik Hatcher wrote: > > You don't have to store a field to highlight text. If you've got it > in your database, retrieve it from there and pass that string to the > highlighter instead. > > Erik > > > On Jan 10, 2007, at 10:45 AM, moraleslos wrote: > >> >> I'm running into a little dilemma with Lucene highlighting and >> indexing. I >> currently index anything and everything that gets inserted into a >> database. >> This database includes all the content that is searched. Now I'll >> have lots >> and lots of content, thinking of the range of 50GB+, all stored in >> the DB. >> Using Lucene, I index all of this. But since I'm using highlighting >> features, I'll also need to store the content into the index. Not >> sure what >> the performance implications are during a search but I know that >> indexing >> performance should be slower as well as the index size being enormous. >> Because I have duplicated data, one in the index and the other in >> the db, >> are there other ways of handling this situation in a more efficient >> and >> performant way? Thanks in advance. >> >> -los >> -- >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Text-storing- >> design-and-performance-question-tf2953201.html#a8259883 >> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Text-storing-design-and-performance-question-tf2953201.html#a8261408 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
