And don't forget that you need to close and re-open the reader to pick up the changes.......
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <G>. On 1/10/07, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#2 is a possible issue. I stared at the code some more: The test case adds up to : Create all the objects. Add three docs. Add a fourth doc. Do a query aimed at the fourth doc. isCurrent() returns false. Close reader/searcher, open reader/searcher, numDocs() in the reader returns 3. Not 4. However, reading your message carefully, I realize that I'm probably fundamentally misguided. There's no flush() API on a writer, so, of course, the only possible way for a reader to see current contents is if the writer gets closed and reopened. I keep trying to cook up some scheme in which this is not true, but, with the stock classes, it now seems self-evident to me that it has to be true. I'll put in the requisite code, and slink away. -----Original Message----- From: Doron Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 4:07 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: isCurrent says no, but contents still invisible That's strange. Since you don't close the writer usually adding the doc would not modify the index (unless adding the doc triggered a merge). You may want to check that: 1. writer and reader really opened against the same path; 2. reader isCurrent state also before adding the doc and after re-opening; 3. searched terms vs. added terms - might not be related to concurrency at all. Finally perhaps post here the code so people can take a look. "Benson Margulies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/01/2007 12:45:08: > I'm trying what should be the dumbest possible example of concurrency > management with 2.0 in Java with an ordinary FSDirectory. > > > > I create an IndexWriter from a pathname, an IndexReader from the same > pathname, and an IndexSearcher from the reader. > > > > I add one document. > > > > I call isCurrent() on the reader. It says, 'false'. > > > > So, I close the reader and the searcher, and I create a new reader and a > new searcher. I search for the document, and I don't find it. > > > > I must be missing something simple. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
