Sorry about that. I think II found the diagram you're talking about on page 89. It even addresses the exact problem I'm talking about.
It's not the first time I've looked like a fool, you'd think I'd be getting used to it by now <G>. So, it seems like the most reasonable solution to this issue would be for me to re-write the phrase queries as SpanNear queries, no? Erick On 3/8/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I think that's "working as designed". Although I could understand : someone wanting it to work differently. The slop is sort of like the : edit distance from the current given phrase, hence the order of terms : in the phrase matters. correct ... LIA has a great diagram explaining this ... the slop refers to how many positions you have to move the terms in the PhraseQuery to match. -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
