Hi, Sorry for my delayed reply. I can't reproduce that OOM error with MultiSearcher now.I'll try to reproduce that error and send you the details that you asked. I've tested to search my index with Multisearcher & separate IndexSearcher.The search time by using Multisearcher is nearly equal the time by separate IndexSearcher.But memory used is more for MultiSearcher.
My Index size is *7.4GB *having 17M documents. Total Search Time for MultiSearcher = 1.1Secs and Max.Memory used = 50937920. And total search time for Separate indexSearcher = 1.4Secs and Max.Memory used = 10039408. Wild card query is used for search. I need to control memory usage. Is there any possible ways to use multisearcher with less memory usage? (FYI- I don't use any sort.) Thanks & Regards Senthil On 3/14/07, Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How much memory are you allocating for your JVM? Because you're paying a huge search time penalty by opening and closing your searcher sequentially, it would be a good thing to not do this. But, as you say, if you're getting OOM errors, that's a problem. What is the total size of all your indexes? That would help folks give you better responses and perhaps suggest other ways of solving your problem..... Erick On 3/14/07, senthil kumaran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi. > I have more index directories (>6) all in GB,and searching my query > with > single IndexSearcher to all indexes one after another.i.e. I create one > IndexSearcher for index1 and search over that.Finally I close that and > create new IndexSearcher for index2 and so on. If i get 200 total results > then i don't go to search other index directories and i print 200 results > and exit from search. > I need to get approximate total matching documents all over the > indexes > without going to search in other indexes. > Please suggest me a easiest way to achieve this. > > P.S: To avoid more memory usage and to reduce search timeI don't want to > search my query through all indexes if i got 200 results. MultiSearcher > create OOM error, so that I'm using single IndexSearcher. > > > Thanks in Advance > Senthil >