Thanks for the ParrallelReader, but that is not going to work either. I can
see a use for it if I could add the document correctly with the content from
Nutch.
Ok, so I will try and ellaborate as much as possible here. From the previous
post I made, I had:
Nutch Index URL
Content
A www.something.com
A lot of junk that needs linked
B www.somethingelse.com
Some more junk that needs linked
Lucene Index(from Database) URL Other
Fields
D www.something.com
G www.something.com
I want to ultimately have this:
DocumentID URL
Other Fields Content
D www.something.com
A lot of junk that needs linked
G www.something.com
A lot of junk that needs linked
This can happen during indexing meaning that those documents will grab the
indexes from Nutch and pull the content out when it matches the URL and add
it to the Lucene Index when indexing from the database or it can happen at
Search Time, meaning that the search goes and looks for matches in the
content field or other fields and then grabs the other index from Nutch or
Lucene (Depending on where the hit happened) and matches them up with the
URL being the link. This would mean that we are matching documents with the
content and url. Hopefully this is enough information.
Thanks again for a reply,
Mike
Daniel Noll-3 wrote:
>
> Yakn wrote:
>> Thanks Damien, I believe that addIndex(index) is only going to add the
>> index
>> into the new indexes. But how do I actually link the document either at
>> search time or index time from the url in the database indexes and the
>> Nutch
>> index? So to explain my problem a little better
>>
>> Nutch Index URL
>>
>> Content
>> A www.something.com
>>
>> A lot of junk that needs linked
>> B www.somethingelse.com
>> Some more junk that needs linked
>>
>> Lucene Index(from Database) URL Other
>> Fields
>> D www.something.com
>> G www.something.com
>>
>> I want D and G to be linked with A either at Indexing time or at
>> searching
>> time. Can anyone elaborate on how to do this. Thanks in advance and
>> thanks
>> again Damien.
>
> Unless you define what "linked with" actually means it's going to be
> hard to offer suggestions, but have you looked at ParallelReader?
>
> If that won't do what you want then the better way to approach this is
> to explain what you're actually trying to *do*, rather than asking for
> advice on how to implement one possibility of doing it.
>
> Daniel
>
>
> --
> Daniel Noll
>
> Nuix Pty Ltd
> Suite 79, 89 Jones St, Ultimo NSW 2007, Australia Ph: +61 2 9280 0699
> Web: http://nuix.com/ Fax: +61 2 9212 6902
>
> This message is intended only for the named recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying,
> distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this
> message or attachment is strictly prohibited.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Linking-two-different-indexes-tf3461011.html#a9679097
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
