Not really. The explain scores aren't normalized and I also couldn't
find a way to get the explain data as anything other than a whitespace
formatted text blob from Solr. Keep in mind that they need confidence
factors from one query to the next. With the explain scores, they can
have wildly different value ranges from query to query. The reviewers
need to be able to see information about the top item of a particular
match. maybe in a layout along the lines of:
A
-- id title
title score director director score year
year score overall score
B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A1 T3
Jonathan Mostow 2003
.3 .7
1 2.0
B5 Terminator 3: Rise of the machines
Mostow, J. 2003
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A1 The Kid & I
Penelope Spheeris 2005
.6 0
.1 0.7
B5 The Kid
Jon Turteltaub 2000
On 4/10/07, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 8:03 PM, Daniel Einspanjer wrote:
> The people reviewing this matching process need some way of
> determining why a particular match was made other than the overall
> score. Was it because the title was a perfect match or was it because
> the title wasn't that close, but the director and year were dead on?
>
Does the explain() method shed any light for you?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
